US media's cultural bias
http://www.gulf-daily-news.com/NewsDetails.aspx?storyid=339439
By JAMAL KANJ
Thursday, October 11, 2012
LAST week I referred to Edward Said's scholarly work on
Western media coverage of Muslim and Arab countries, shaped by discreet
cultural biases or political motives. This fact couldn't be more pertinent than
in recent coverage of protests against the film deriding Prophet Mohammed.
For days, the media was fixated on protests and the ensuing
senseless violence.
US presidential candidate Mitt Romney's knee-jerk reaction
to protests in Libya and Egypt was to admonish the Obama administration,
blaming the violence on field ambassadors for condemning the movie and not
"standing up for American values".
The same media and candidate (until his speech last week)
all but ignored the more than 30,000 Libyans who took to the streets of
Benghazi, protesting the attack on the US consulate.
At least 10 Libyans were killed as they ransacked offices of
the group allegedly linked to the assault on the consulate, but the Western
media downplayed the sacrifices of Libyans fighting the suspected killers of
the US diplomat and staff.
The cultural bias in reporting is prevalent in major US
media outlets. For example, on October 1, US news station NBC reported that
"three US soldiers" and "several Afghanis" were killed in a
suicide attack in Afghanistan. Viewers were not told that the "several
Afghanis" were actually 11 humans, including four police officers, an
interpreter and six civilians.
This pattern of reporting exemplifies a subconscious
cultural bias, where the loss of American or Israeli life is more important.
Americans and Israelis are considered actual people, while
others are "collateral damage" statistics.
The cultural bias is complemented by self-motivated
reporters, who manipulate the Middle East news narrative relayed to
unsuspecting Westerners.
For example, many international correspondents in Jerusalem
are reserve duty officers or have children serving in the Israeli army.
Jonathan Cook, British journalist based in Nazareth, said:
"It is common to hear Western reporters (in Israel) boasting to one
another about their Zionist credentials, their service in the Israeli army or
the loyal service of their children."
The New York Times never disclosed that its Jerusalem bureau
chief between 2010 and 2012, Ethan Bronner, was an Israeli citizen, with a son
serving in the Israeli army.
Nor did National Public Radio reveal that its correspondent
Linda Gradstein was married to an Israeli military sniper.
Other media pundits, including Joel Greenberg, once a New
York Times bureau chief in Jerusalem, have served in the Israeli army and been
on reserve duty. Mitch Weinstock, national editor of the Union Tribune in San
Diego, is an Israeli military veteran.
Wolf Blitzer, otherwise known by his Israeli pen name Zev
Barak, hosts a major CNN news programme, but was once the Middle East foreign
policy analyst and editor for Near East Report, an organ for the American
Israel Public Affairs Committee, the strongest US foreign lobby.
News correspondents, veterans or reserve army officers with
conspicuous national allegiance cease to be objective, especially when
reporting on their own military units or governments. Reporters with
predisposed opinions are advocates incapable of being neutral.
The combination of a formidable Israeli lobby charting US
foreign policy in the Middle East, juxtaposed with special interest reporters
manipulating America's public opinion, suggest more US involvement in new,
Israeli-contrived adventures akin to the invasion of Iraq.
|