Megalomaniac
vs monomaniacs in Syria
JAMAL KANJ
Thursday,
January 31, 2013
SYRIAN
President Bashar Al Assad has a penchant for blaming outside conspirators for
the troubles in Syria.
While
plausible, he is mistaken in linking public demands for political reform with
presumed plots against his country.
His pompous
speech three weeks ago on a political resolution for the carnage in Syria was
preposterous. After 22
months of killing and counter-murders, Al Assad still can't see the huge gap
between what is best for his country and his dysfunctional rule.
He, like
other dictators, is far removed from reality in "forbidden" palaces -
surrounded by a culture of professional sycophants.
Unfortunately
for the people of Syria they are caught between a megalomaniac leader and a
monomaniac, exiled opposition guiding a "revolution" remotely from
the halls of five-star hotels in foreign capitals.
Al Assad is
supported by Iran and the self-professed "resistance block", while
the opposition is a collage of incongruous actors ranging from totalitarian
regimes, Western democracies and Al Qaeda-inspired fighters swarming into Syria
from their underground dens.
The regime's
artificial lifeline extended by Russia, China and Iran is perpetuating the
divide among the Syrian people and disintegrating the country along ethnic and
sectarian lines.
Based on the
most recent count, more than 60,000 have lost their lives and 650,000 have
become refugees in neighbouring countries.
The Syrian
leader missed a great opportunity in March, 2011 to address public protests. He relied
instead on cruel military power to launch a crackdown on unarmed civilians.
Since 2011,
the intensity of the conflict has grown linearly along with the growing level
of repression.
Refusing to
heed mass demonstrations demanding political reform, government suppression
transformed street protests into armed revolution.
Failing to
address genuine public frustrations, Al Assad provided the golden opportunity
for foreign "conspirators" to plot against Syria.
Irrespective,
it is unfeasible for these supposed foreign plotters to recruit millions of
willing "collaborators" to bring down their own country.
Using Scud
missiles and jet fighters against his own people simply presents foreign
"conspirators" additional incentives to "recruit" amenable
partners who seek heavy weapons to match the regime's tools of oppression.
Meanwhile,
the international community is in no hurry to help put an end to the
internecine fratricide.
While Russia
wants to maintain a sphere of influence on the Mediterranean shores, Israel's
(and therefore the Western) agenda is to prolong the conflict until Syria's
military capabilities are destroyed and its people are polarised in a quagmire
of mutual hate.
In 1982,
Zionist protagonists commissioned by The World Zionist Organisation published
"A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties".
The document
states: "The dissolution of Syria... into ethnically or religiously unique
area... is Israel's primary target."
It also
stated that breaking up Syria's military power was "the primary short term
target".
Consciously
or unintentionally, Al Assad and the opposition are contributing equally to
Israel's 30-year-old vision to destroy the Syrian army and to bring about the
fragmentation of Syria.
Regardless
of the conqueror, Syria - even if it remains united - will emerge as a
devastated nation that relies on international benefactors to rebuild its
infrastructure and economy.
As such,
Syrians will lose their bona fide national independence and their country will
become a vassal state at the mercy of donor countries.
Instead of
these bizarre jamborees pledging money to fuel the fighting, the international
community (Russia and the West) must take concrete steps to compel Al Assad to
dismantle his feared security apparatus and help establish a transitional
government led by the home-based opposition, who remain steadfast to their
convictions of non-violence.
Russia needs
to realise that Al Assad is part of the problem, not the solution.
The West
must also recognise that the detached, five-star hotel denizens have no
tangible credibility at home either.
To paraphrase
the speech by French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius at a Paris conference this
week, escalating the conflict will only allow "extremism and
terrorism" to prevail.
But to
Israel's delight, the outcome of the conflict will leave the US and Russia,
next to the people of Syria, as the biggest strategic losers.
|