The Ghoul and the Arab Populous Revolt
April 30th, 2011
Growing up in a Palestinian refugee camp, I remember at times when my
little brother cried for no good reason at night; my late mother would
warn him: the ghoul comes to the sound of crying children. Instinctively
petrified from this imaginative monster, the child would hush
instantly.
Today’s contemporary ghoul to scare off the West is Al Qaida. Indeed,
it was a monster impregnated in the most radicalized fringe elements of
Muslim and Arab societies, was incubated under repressive
dictatorships, and fed by Western hypocrisy.
Archaic Arab dictators from Qaddafi of Libya, to Saleh of Yemen,
passing through Abdulla of Jordan to Syria’s Assad, are sounding alarm
that Al Qaida “ghoul” is behind the Arab mass revolt.
The Arab dictators with bifurcated tongue breaching in their local
media an American and Israeli conspiracy undermining leadership and
national stability. An assertion is more evident today in Syria which
calls itself a “confrontation state” against Israel and American
hegemony of the Arab world. I’ll elaborate on this later.
In Yemen, Ali Saleh spoke of a plan cooked in Tel Aviv and
Washington, before apologizing to US government after his speech was
translated into English. Qaddafi warned Libyans in Arabic that the West
wants to colonize Libya and control its natural resources.
To the international press corps, the story takes a different nuance.
Directed for Western consumption, the dictators allege that Al Qaida is
propagating the public revolt. And to be more convincing, Qaddafi
warned, fallaciously, that the tranquility in the Mediterranean, Europe
and the “so called Israel” would be jeopardized should “Al Qaida” take
over Libya.
The delusional dictators, starting from the Yemeni leader who
pretentiously declared that serving as president was leverage, not
privilege; to Qaddafi who pompously announced that he was a
revolutionary leader: if I was president, I would have thrown my
resignation before your faces; meandering to Ben Ali’s twilight speech
reminding the Tunisian people of his life “service” to the country, or
Mubarak’s at the sunset of his regime addressing the Egyptians “I never
sought phony popularity.”
In Syria, the government ruled by a supposed Pan Arab Ba’ath party
system for almost 40 years, an apparatus was used to glorify the
“leader” in a system of collective universal deceit. Such was also the
National party under Mubarak in Egypt, where governments and parties
were controlled by sycophants groveling to the leaderships (and their
children), turning the party into a groupthink machine echoing the
dictators’ “sacred revelations,” creating in the process self deceptive
delusional culture of political robots recycling the leaderships’
lifeless “revelations,” while suffocating any critical thinking at
large. Hence, reinforcing the leader’s megalomaniac grandiose, and
ultimately, deluding these dictators to genuinely believe the popularity
of their regimes and the public admiration of their person.
In addition to Al Qaida ghoul, Syria under Assad perpetuated very
powerful clan of sectarian loyalists outside the government or party
structure. Thus, offering credible merits to the fear that the battle
for change in Syria may lead to protracted sectarian instability, which
can flare into Lebanon and other areas in the region. There was a risk
if the Syrians failed to transcend the regime’s concocted sectarian
divide, Israel, as it did in the 1970s in Lebanon, would likely inject
its venoms to deepen the divide along sectarian lines.
There is no denying that Syria under its current leadership has
embraced progressive positions and has provided support to resistance
forces in Lebanon and occupied Palestine. Lest not be fooled however,
the adopted official political positions were more in response to
intuitive public sentiment as much as it was leadership stance.
No progressive position, however lofty can justify the dictatorship
form of government for 40 years. The Syrian dictatorship never lost an
opportunity to exploit the Palestine cause to lend legitimacy for its
one party and one leader rule over the Syrian people. Yet, the same
leadership had failed to confront Israeli occupation and later
annexation of the Syrian Golan Heights, and more recently by its inept
response to the destroying of a purported nuclear facility (under
construction) in Syria’s heartland. In fact, the occupied Golan Heights
remained the most peaceful of all borders with Israel.
Almost all Arab dictators have sprung from self professed revolutions
championing the Palestinian cause. Arab dictatorship, the last bastion
of dictatorships, brought nothing but international contempt to Arabs,
achieved no economic progress or political justice, and perpetuated the
occupation of Palestine and Arab land. The Arab masses are fed up. To
paraphrase George Orwell, dictatorship is not needed to safeguard the
revolution or to lead Arabs forwards.